Second Part of a Bibliography on the Philosophy of Avicenna

ion 39; Abraham D. Stone: Simplicius and Avicenna on the essential corporeity of material substance 73; David C. Reisman: Avicenna at the ARCE 131-182. ———. 2003. Avicenna's Metaphysics in Context. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 75. ———. 2003. "Towards a history of Avicenna's distinction between immanent and transcendent causes." In Before and After Avicenna. Proceedings of the First Conference of the Avicenna Study Group, edited by Reisman, David C. and Al-Rahim, Ahmed H., 49-68. Leiden: Brill. 76. ———. 2005. "Avicenna and the Avicennian Tradition." In The Cambridge Companion to Arabic Philosophy, edited by Adamson, Peter and Taylor, Richard, 92-136. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. "My aim in this book is to present a history of the metaphysics of Abú `Ali al-Husayn ibn `Abdallah ibn Sinâ, known in the West by his Latinized name Avicenna. Since 1937, when Amélie-Marie Goichon published La distinction de l'essence et de l'existence d'après Ibn Sinâ (Avicenne), no serious book-length study specifically devoted to Avicenna's metaphysics has appeared. This is surprising enough given how influential Avicenna's metaphysical ideas were, but what makes it astonishing is that tremendous advances have taken place since Goichon's time in fields relevant to this topic. Those fields include from the ultimate to the proximate, to use Avicenna's terms the study of late antique Greek philosophy and the study of classical Islamic doctrinal theology, or kalâm; the study of the Greco-Arabic philosophical translations and the study of the philosophy of al-Farabi; and the study of Avicenna's metaphysics and the study of his intellectual biography." 77. Wippel, John F. 1973. "Commentary of Boethius De Trinitate: Thomas Aquinas and Avicenna on the relationship between First Philosophy and the other theoretical sciences." Thomist no. 37:133-154. 78. ———. 1990. "The Latin Avicenna as a source for Thomas Aquinas's metaphysics." Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Theologie:51-90. 79. ———. 1999. "Thomas Aquinas, Siger of Brabant, and their use of Avicenna in clarifying the subject of metaphysics." In Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of philosophy. Volume 2: Metaphysics, edited by Rockmore, Tom, 15-26. Bowling Green: Philosophy Documentation Center, Bowling Green State University. "Both Aquinas and Siger were familiar with a fundamental disagreement within the earlier philosophical tradition concerning the subject of metaphysics: is it being as being, or is it divine being? if Avicenna represented one approach to this issue, and Averroes another, both Thomas and Siger were closer to Avicenna than to Averroes in their respective solutions. Nonetheless, each resolved the issue in a distinct way." 80. Zedler, Beatrice. 1948. "Saint Thomas and Avicenna in the De potentia." Traditio.Studies in Ancient and Medieval thought, history, and religion no. 6:105-159. 81. ———. 1976. "Another look at Avicenna." New Scholasticism no. 50:504-521. 82. ———. 1981. "Why are the possibles possible?" New Scholasticism no. 55:113-130. 83. Zghal, Hatem. 2004. "La connaissance des singuliers chez Avicenne." In De Zénon d'Élée à Poincaré. Recueil d'études en hommage à Roshdi Rashed, edited by Morelon, Régis and Hasnawi, Ahmad, 685-718. Louvain: Peeters Publishers. 84. ———. 2006. "La relation chez Avicenne." Arabic Sciences and Philosophy no. 16:237-286. 85. Second Part of a Bibliography on the Philosophy of Avicenna https://www.ontology.co/biblio/avicenna-biblio-two.htm 9 di 10 21/09/2016 19:46